![]() ![]() I can only think of one bit of technology that might be impacting this - compression over DisplayPort, providing higher framerates, or maybe G-Sync (which is a bit of a mystery to me.). ![]() I don't think there are any 3070s lower than that. ![]() I'm using a lower tier RTX3070 (220w-240w) at the lowest end (220w). This is Radeon RX6900XT level performance, according to Passmark. The GPU operates at a maximum of 219w (against another run: giving 24901, DX12 146. The DX12 number is 146.Īs you can see from the AIDA64 'maximum' columns, the system is not at all stretched. When I turn off all performance enhancements in NVidia's Control Panel (eg going from 'Performance' to 'Quality' throughout), the result is 24986, or about -4%. That's only -1.4% down (hardly worth the effort, for framerates!) When I turn off all my tuning enhancements (CPU/IF/Mem back to 3600, memory completely at XFR2 defaults), I get 25925. Gaming Memory Size: 261. 4292 MHz Videocard GeForce RTX 3070 Drive Sabrent Rocket 4. : 2695 MHz Videocard GeForce RTX 4090 Drive Samsung SSD. This particular area of expertise means that we focus on solutions which monitor and compare hardware and software. I get a 3D Graphics score (in Performance Test 10.0) of about 26285, and a DX12 score of 162 using a Gigabyte Eagle RTX3070 PassMark Software - PC Benchmarks - Over 800,000 CPUs and 1,000 models benchmarked and compared in graph form, updated daily. We specialize in the development of tools for the evaluation of computer hardware and software. I use an LG 27GN950B 4k monitor with 10 bit (8-bit + frc) colour and Freesync + G-Sync. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs. The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar. The first is by the OP (with the problem), the second is mine. The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. Yes, those statements DO contradict each other. The 4070-Ti is around 50 faster than the 3070-Ti and offers similar performance to the 3090-Ti at less than half the price. Those two statements seem to contradict each other. It features 7,680 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.6 GHz, 12 GB of memory, a 192-bit memory bus, 60 3rd gen RT cores, 240 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 285W and an MSRP of 800 USD. their monitor forces them to 800圆00 pixels) then we scale the fps result down to compensate for the lack of resolution. But in the case where the user can't get to the target 4K resolution (e.g. Yes, the numbers for the DX12 test are frame per sec (fps). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |